A Level for Everyone?
What Are We Actually Teaching?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with recreational dance. There is also nothing inherently better about calling yourself a competitive studio. Not every dancer needs to train seven to ten hours a week, spend additional hours in rehearsal, compete every weekend, or have professional aspirations.
What matters is understanding what your program actually provides and being honest about it.
A recreational studio may enter competition simply to give its dancers another performance opportunity. A competitive studio may discover that its training isn't producing the same results as other programs using that same label. And an advanced program may choose to enter strong dancers into an intermediate level because the rules allow it and the studio believes it gives them a better opportunity to win. These are different situations, but they share the same reality.
Competition puts your program in front of dancers and families from other studios, and everyone may walk away seeing something different.
Dance Is Different From Other Youth Sports
Think about basketball, football, volleyball, swimming, or gymnastics. There are defined structures, rules, and standards that give families some context for what they're watching.
Dance doesn't really have that.
There is no industry-wide definition of "novice," "intermediate," "competitive," or "advanced." One competition has three levels. Another has five. Another has seven. Training requirements are different. Enforcement is different. Judging criteria and scoring systems can be different.
A dancer can be considered intermediate at one competition and placed in a completely different level the next weekend.
And we can't ignore that dance competitions are businesses. Making competition accessible to more dancers can absolutely be a good thing. It also means more entries, more studios, and more revenue.
Both things can be true.
Parents Still See Everything
Let's say a studio brings a recreational jazz group of 9-year-olds to a competition.
They perform, and the next routine might be an advanced group of the same age. Then comes a different style, a different age, and another competitive level.
That's fairly normal in dance competition scheduling.
Many competitions mix routines from different styles, ages, and levels throughout the day. The emphasis becomes less about routines competing directly against each other and more about each routine performing for its own score.
There are reasons competitions structure events this way. But it can make it incredibly difficult for families, especially those new to competition, to understand what they're actually watching.
A novice group may be immediately followed by an advanced group. To an experienced teacher, those dancers aren't necessarily competing against each other. To a parent, they're two groups of 9-year-olds performing jazz routines on the same stage.
Naturally, they're going to compare them.
Awards can make things even more confusing. A routine receives an adjudication award, wins first in its category, but doesn't place in the overall awards. Another routine that appeared right before it may have been in an entirely different level.
Parents are left asking: Were we competing against them? What did we actually win? Why did we get first place but not make the overall?
A system designed to emphasize scores instead of direct competition doesn't eliminate comparison. It can actually create comparison without giving families the context to understand what they're comparing, and studio owners are often left explaining it. Putting dancers into different competitive levels may change who they're competing against for an award.
It doesn't change who families are watching or who dancers are comparing themselves to.
For Studio Owners
Competition puts your program on display in a way that very few other parts of running a studio do.
If you're taking recreational dancers, think about what happens when they see another program and want more.
If you consider yourself a competitive studio, understand that families are going to see other competitive programs too. They may start asking questions about differences in technique, training, opportunities, or results.
And if you routinely place advanced dancers into lower competitive levels because the rules allow it, understand that families are watching that too.
Winning doesn't happen privately.
Every time a studio name is announced at awards, that studio is being introduced to an auditorium full of dancers and parents. When the same name is repeatedly called for category wins and overall placements, people remember it.
That's powerful exposure, and nobody has to intentionally recruit another studio's students for it to happen. The competition has already put your studio's name and training in front of everyone in the room.
There is a financial side to this too.
Studios invest staff time, rehearsals, choreography, administration, and preparation into competing. Families are making an investment as well. If competition causes them to begin questioning whether another program better fits what their dancer wants, the potential cost to the studio goes beyond the competition weekend.
You can lose students.
That doesn't mean studios should be afraid to compete. It means there should be a reason you're doing it.
Competition doesn't just evaluate routines. It puts training programs on display.
For Parents
Seeing another dancer the same age doing something your child can't do doesn't automatically mean your studio is doing something wrong. It also doesn't automatically mean the other studio is better.
There may be a significant difference in the training behind what you're seeing.
One dancer may take two or three hours of class each week. Another may take seven to ten hours, plus rehearsals. One may be in a recreational program while another has chosen a more intensive program.
Neither choice is inherently better. They have different goals and expectations.
Words like recreational, competitive, pre-professional, and elite aren't standardized either. A studio calling itself competitive doesn't tell you how much its dancers train or what its program is designed to accomplish.
Parents should also feel comfortable asking what they're paying for.
Competition can be expensive. Beyond entry fees, there may be costumes, choreography, rehearsals, travel, hotels, and other expenses throughout the season.
There is nothing wrong with paying for your child to have fun or have another opportunity to perform. But you should know what you're buying. Is competition primarily another performance opportunity? Is it part of your dancer's education? Are judges' corrections taken back into the classroom? Is competitive achievement a goal? Is it a combination of those things? There isn't one correct answer. But when families are investing significant money and dancers are investing their time and emotions, there should be an honest answer.
And if something you see at competition makes you question your dancer's training, ask questions before assuming they need a new studio. Talk to their teacher. Understand what opportunities are available. Most importantly, ask your dancer what THEY want.
More training isn't automatically better if it isn't what your child wants from dance.
For Dancers
There will always be someone who can do something you can't do yet.
That doesn't take away from what you've accomplished.
If you see another dancer onstage and think, "I want to be able to do that," talk to your teacher. Find out what goes into developing that skill and decide whether you're interested in putting in the training required to get there.
You may want more training. You may also be completely happy with the amount of dance you're already doing.
Both are okay.
Someone else's success doesn't make you unsuccessful.
So What About Levels?
If dancers have different amounts of training, wouldn't levels make competition more fair?
They can make the competitive field more comparable. That's a legitimate argument for them.
But levels don't change where a dancer actually is in their training. And without standardized definitions across the industry, adding more labels doesn't necessarily make the experience easier for families to understand.
This is one area where Atlas made a different choice.
We schedule by age and category. All 10–12 Jazz Large Groups compete together, then all 13–15 Jazz Large Groups, and so on. The routines you're watching are the routines you're competing against, both within the category and for the overall Large Group placements.
That doesn't make the dancers equal. It makes the competition clear.
Sometimes another group will be stronger. Sometimes your group will be stronger.
Everyone in the room knows who is competing against whom and what they're competing for.
But What If My Dancer Doesn't Win?
Whether you're a parent, dancer, or studio owner, this may be the most important part of the conversation.
If first place is the only way we recognize success, we're missing much of what competition can offer.
A dancer can improve their adjudication. They can apply a judge's correction. A group can return the following season noticeably stronger. A dancer can give the best performance they've ever given and still not have the highest score in the room.
None of that becomes less valuable because somebody else won.
And the answer isn't that every dancer suddenly needs more classes and rehearsals.
Progress should make sense for the dancer, their goals, and the program they've chosen.
If we say competition is about more than winning, we have to mean it when we don't win too.
What Should Competition Give You?
Competition should be fun. Dancers should enjoy performing, make memories with their teammates, and be excited to walk onto the stage.
But considering the amount of time, money, and emotion that families and studios invest, we think it's fair to ask whether competition should provide more than stage time.
It should challenge dancers. It should recognize achievement. It should provide great feedback from experienced judges. It should show dancers what they're doing well and where they can improve.
And sometimes, it should start conversations.
A dancer might discover they want more training. A parent might better understand the differences between programs. A studio owner might recognize an opportunity to create a new pathway for students. Or everyone might leave completely confident that the program they're already in is exactly where they want to be.
We've experienced competition as dancers, educators, studio owners, and now from the competition side. One thing that perspective has taught us is that there isn't one path that is right for every dancer or every studio.
But there should be honesty about the path you've chosen and what you're hoping to get from it.
An award is great to take home on Sunday.
But competition should also give dancers, families, and studios something worth taking back to the studio on Monday.
-ATLAS DANCE CHALLENGE-
Comments